Winding route to power
Jul 11 2010
Among the power companies to have hit the market over the past six to eight months are NHPC, Rural Electrification Corporation, NTPC and Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam; while Jindal Power, Sterlite Energy and Power Grid have lined up their IPOs.
It is the huge demand-supply gap for electricity in the country that makes the sector a logical and lucrative investment option. During the April-May period, the country witnessed a supply shortfall by 14.3 per cent.
Sector outlook
For retail investors, although the sector looks a good buy, they must keep in mind the risks of investing their hard-earned money in power stocks.
Jagannadham Thunuguntla, head of research at SMC Capitals, said, “There is no denying the importance of power projects in India, considering the demand-supply mismatch in the sector. However, the power projects come with a set of risks ranging from the sector’s capital-intensive nature to problems in acquiring land to environmental issues, execution risks, etc. Investors should be aware of these risks before investing in the power space.”
Power projects are highly capital-intensive. Producing one megawatt of electricity costs between Rs 5 crore and Rs 6 crore. Also, they have a long gestation period, with an electricity generation project taking an average of four to five years to get commissioned, and another 10 to 12 months to generate positive cash flows.
Development of hydroelectric power projects takes even longer when compared with thermal power projects.
The government had planned to add 80,000 mw under the eleventh five-year plan (2007-2012) to the present installed capacity of around 1,60,000 mw. However, at present, various projects which are under development aim at a generation capacity of only 40,000 mw. In line with this, the government has already cut the capacity target to 55,000 mw for the eleventh plan ending March 2012.
Roadblocks
Coming to the various problems faced by the sector, it is subject to extensive government regulation, which wastes a lot of time by way of seeking various approvals, licences, registrations, etc. The approvals are subject to fulfilment of certain conditions, and even a single glitch can result in scrapping of the proposed project. Besides, the developers are required to consult the regulatory bodies every time the original cost estimate has to be increased.
Among other problems is the environmental issue. The ministry of environment and forest is getting stricter by the day in enforcing laws like keeping a rigid cap on the discharge of pollutants into air, land and water. Although a welcome move, this requires substantial capital expenditure by the developer. Adding to the woes, a developer also requires clearances from respective state pollution control boards, the ministry of water resources ... the list is long.
Besides, they don’t even have a choice to set the tariff, which is determined by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC).
However, in what comes as some reprieve — for the period between April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2014, CERC has raised return on equity (RoE) for power units from 14 per cent to 15.5 per cent. If the project is completed on time, the RoE is at 16 per cent.
Although there are several factors which can delay a project, like below par performance of contractors, unforeseen engineering troubles, disputes with workers, non-availability of finances, delays in entering into definitive power purchase agreements and unanticipated cost increases, etc — land acquisition remains the biggest cause.
Power companies generally finance 70-80 per cent of the total capital expenditure by way of raising debt. This exposes them to an interest rate risk as most of the debt facilities have variable interest rates.
Vaibhav Sanghvi, director at Ambit Research, said, “Investors must look at the company’s valuations, its management capabilities and the time book of the previously executed plans. Since power projects are time-consuming and capital-intensive, each and every aspect should be valued thoroughly before any investment is made in the sector.”
Raw materials used in construction of power projects, including cement, steel and other equipment, form a significant part of the overall project cost.
The price and supply of equipment and other raw materials depend on various factors including general economic conditions, competition, production levels, transportation costs and import duties. One of the things the success of a power project depends on is the sourcing of fuel at a competitive price.
Weather woes
Water is a key input for both hydroelectric and thermal power generation. Hence, the generation capacity is highly dependent on unconstrained and undiminished availability of water during the entire life span of the power stations. A change in weather patterns and inconsistent rainfall thus becomes a big hindrance at the power stations.
Evacuating power from plants poses significant challenges due to transmission constraints on account of congestion in the transmission system, among other things. Evacuating power depends on the terms of the power purchase agreement entered between the purchaser and generator.
Transport troubles
Promoters of power projects depend heavily on different modes of transport — roadway, railways and pipelines, to receive fuel, raw materials and water during the construction and operations of the projects. Building of transportation infrastructure entails obtaining approvals, rights of way from the central and state governments.
If these risks emerge, they amount to delays, cost overruns, lower or no returns on capital, erosion of capital and reduced revenue for a company.
Besides, there is an intense competition for experienced senior management and other key personnel with technical and industry expertise in the power generation industry. Companies are finding it difficult to retain their manpower.
Stock review
Since May 20, when the last power sector IPO hit Dalal Street, the BSE power index has returned 5.19 per cent. Among the newly listed stocks, NHPC and JSW Energy jumped 9.03 per cent and 7.22 per cent. Adani Power and Indiabulls
Power climbed 8.42 per cent and 5.22
per cent.
However, SJVN stock has struggled to break even its listing price of Rs 26 and is trading down 2.40 per cent since it commenced trading from May 20.
Thunuguntla believes while the capital markets have seen a series of power sector public issues in the past couple of years, it is yet to be seen how these companies handle these inherent risks of the power sector.
DD Sharma, vice president (retail) at Anand Rathi, cautioned, “Investors should invest only in those companies, which are operating various plants. Retail investors, since their investments are less and the fact that they cannot wait for holding stocks more than two to three years, can only generate returns, when investments are made in well-established companies. The risk associated with new entrants, delay in the completion of projects and thus delays in materialisation of their achievements in their fundamentals, are some factors which retail investors would never like to factor in.”
“We would never advice investors to invest in the companies which are new to power space,” he said.
Meanwhile, stocks of Reliance Power jumped 26.33 per cent during the period (since May 20) thanks to the merger plan with RNRL.


















Post new comment