Silicon Valley, where the mass transit goes to die

Tags: Op-ed

Residents, businesses must invest in infrastructure they already have

Silicon Valley, where the mass transit goes to die
TECHIE VALLEY: This 2007 file photo shows Building One on the Microsoft campus in Mountain View, California. Google is in Mountain View, but its campus is nowhere near its town’s commuter-rail station
California’s Silicon Valley has always posed a certain challenge to urbanists. In their view, cities are critical for commerce and innovation.

For a while, the sprawling office parks in the Santa Clara Valley, south of San Francisco, seemed to put a lie to that idea. If city living was in, then why did a 20-year-old Mark Zuckerberg leave the walkable streets of Cambridge, Massachusetts, to start his company down the street from the Los Altos Golf and Country Club?

That was then. Silicon Va­lley’s engineers already flee the suburbs at night, riding company shuttles and the Caltrain commuter rail system from the office parks home to hip neighbourhoods in San Francisco. And the newer social-media darlings — Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest — are moving their offices to downtown San Francisco, cutting out the Valley entirely. Zuckerberg said that if he could do it over again, he would have stayed in Boston.

Silicon Valley could have followed in the path of northern Virginia, which sprouted apartment buildings and office towers along its Washington Metro lines and now attracts many young people seeking urban living.

But the Valley, the golden hub of American invention and home to the best engineers in the world, has nothing like the Metro.

The main job centres ha­ve access only to Caltrain, with little capacity left to spur the new, transit-oriented development that young engineers and software designers demand. Google is in Mountain View, and Fac­ebook recently moved to Menlo Park, but neither co­mpany’s campus is anywhere near its town’s commuter-rail station. The rich, large technology companies instead buy cheaper property along the freeways.

Yet transit in Silicon Valley doesn’t suffer from want of regional funding. From the Bay Area Rapid Transit, the first big post-World War II subway project in the US, in the 1960s, to the half-dozen projects under construction across the region today, Bay area leaders have had no trouble wrangling money from local taxpayers and the federal government for tr­ains. Spending money, tho­ugh, is a lot easier than building transit. All too of­ten, flashy and expensive commuter projects are financed while more practical ideas for maximising the existing infrastructure are neglected and delayed.

With stations in every major town in Silicon Valley, Caltrain, which runs 79 mi­les from San Francisco to San Jose and beyond, would seem to be well-positioned to form the transit backbone of America’s technology hub.

Instead, the line offers only hourly service off-peak, and rush-hour service is packed. Its tracks are not electrified, and its San Francisco terminal is slightly more than a mile short of the financial district, which has the region’s largest concentration of jobs and a network of transit connections.

Bringing the service do­wntown has been under consideration since the state began subsidising it in 1980, but Caltrain is the ugly stepchild of Bay area transit, and the project has never been funded. Many other projects in Silicon Valley, though, have been.

The first new project was the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s light-rail system. The system runs from highway-choked downtown San Jose through the suburban office parks of the Santa Clara Valley. You’re more likely to find parking lots than houses and jobs next to stations, and the authority has added to the expanse of asphalt with a few surface lots of its own, which remain 80 per cent empty. The San Jose Mercury News published an article on its 25th anniversary calling it “among the nation’s worst” light-rail lines.

Kevin Connolly, the authority’s transportation planning manager, told the Mercury News that the poor performance is due to the decision to route the line along undeveloped land and to try to “graft a big-city transit type of mode onto a suburban environment.”

Strange, then, that his agency is taking on yet another “big-city transit type”: the BART extension from the East Bay city of Fremont through Santa Clara County, the home of Silicon Valley. The original $6.1 billion plan was to build a subway thr­ough downtown San Jose, the county seat, but it was scaled back to a $2.1 billion, two-stop elevated extension.

The project’s champion is the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, the high-technology trade association that has been instrumental in gaining support for sales-tax measures to fund transportation projects. Its leader, Carl Gu­ardino, said in an interview that his group has also advocated for Caltrain, and that he hoped to see a ballot measure pass in 2016 to give the system a permanent revenue source.

For decades, the Bay area has thrown federal, state and local money at new co­mmuter-transit projects, while the share of Silicon Valley residents who use mass transportation has ba­rely budged. Building transit is a worthy goal, but if Silicon Valley residents and businesses want to get their money’s worth and promote good urban-planning practices, they can start by investing in the infrastructure they already have.


(Stephen Smith covers real estate, land use and mass transportation. The opinions expressed are his own.)


  • Annual reports make sense only if accountable governance is in place

    It’s a sign of a lack of imagination to expect an annual report by a party in power to pull out some impressive performance given the complex nature


Stay informed on our latest news!


Amita Sharma

Political rhetoric makes for counter poetry

Poetic flourishes flavour politics. Ghalib and Hafez flowed profusely to ...

Zehra Naqvi

Watch your words, for they can kill

You must’ve heard the ph­rase ‘if looks could kill’. Ever ...

Dharmendra Khandal

Biodiversity day has come and gone. Yet again

Every year on May 22, world celebrates international biodiversity day. ...


William D. Green

Chairman & CEO, Accenture