Follies and foibles of Bollywood

Tags: Bollywood, Op-ed
I for one pride myself on being a huge fan of our own Bollywood.

RELATED ARTICLES

With a personal collection exceeding 900 DVDs, all original and fully paid for, and mo­st of them from the Bollywood stable, I guess I earned the ri­ght (rather spent enough to acquire the right) to call myself one of the biggest Bollywood fans. I was such a big fan that whenever any of my friends or colleagues would ri­dicule Bollywood, I would co­n­sider it a personal offence and battle it out. This was the way it was till the Diwali we­ekend this year.

It was a long weekend and we had nothing much to do at home. My wife and I decided to watch Kambakht Ishq, wh­ich had released earlier, but for some strange reason we had missed. A DVD was pr­omptly bought and we settled down to watch the movie on my home theatre, which I am particularly fond of showing off.

The movie was chugging al­ong nicely. Kareena Kapoor is a model/actor/doctor and Aksh­ay Kumar lands up as her patient. Interesting. In one sc­ene, Kareena is suppos­ed to be looking at Akshay’s medical reports. She does a good job at enacting the doctor’s role and looks at the reports as seriously as a genuine doctor would. Impressive, I thought.

But hey, something was wr­ong. There was something th­at was very very wrong in the sc­ene. It was not the acting, it was not the situation, there was something else. I paused the DVD and rewound much to my wife’s irritation. And th­en I paused. The frame froze on the screen. And there it was. I did not believe my eyes when I saw it. To confirm, I zoomed into the picture (these days the gizmos come loaded with all these features).

In front of my eyes was the medical report that Kareena was looking at. It was supposed to be Akshay’s medical history. And guess what it actually was? Don’t be surprised — it was an income tax return. A Saral tax form, complete with the signature and even with an income tax “received” stamp!

When the makers of the fi­lm were picturising the scene, they would have just put some papers in the file and shown it as a medical report. However, shouldn’t they have taken ca­re to ensure that such faux pas does not happen? That is what people call “eye for the detail”.

Moviegoers are not idiots that anything can be passed off in the name of a medical report. The average moviegoer may not be filing tax returns, given that less than 5 per cent of India files tax returns, but I am sure they are discerning enough to know the difference between a me­dical report and an income-tax return.

Another such incident ha­ppened that weekend. This time I went out to watch, Ma­in aurr Mrs Khanna. Salman and Kareena as the lead pair, the movie had to be good. Or so I thought.

Guess what? Kareena lives in an orphanage and wears designer clothing. Well, I consider that acceptable given that the movie has to be made in an aesthetic manner and Kareena, even if she is in an orphanage, has to look good. But what came later was st­range, if not unacceptable. Ka­reena is in a church, bows before Christ. There are a nu­mber of unlit candles in front of her. When she opens her eyes, lo and behold, the candles are lit, and there is a gentleman walking out of the ch­urch with a swagger of Sal­man, because he is Salman. Kareena runs after him and confronts him and he asks her to become Mrs Khanna.

Well is this how love at first sight happens? And even if it does, what was Mr Khanna do­ing in a church? He is more likely to go to a gurudwara or a temple. While this may be a touchy question, it is quite un­likely that Mr Khanna wo­uld go to a church and patao a orphanage ki kudi. And if th­ere is a valid reason for him to do so, then the filmmakers should have provided a rationale for this. Else it would be construed that Sohail Kh­an and company had no clue about what was going into the film that they were making.

These two back-to-back incidents made me a bit concerned that big names in the industry are taking moviegoers for a royal ride. The attitude of “sab kuch chalta hai” will sooner than later be the reason for the downfall of ma­ny biggies.

Though not entirely due to the observations above, both the movies bombed at the box office and caused considerab­le financial loss to the producers.

Despite being disappointing, these incidents have not completely unravelled my fai­th fr­om the Indian film industry. I continue to remain a big, big fan, however, I might not so vigorously defend Bollywo­od from the ridicule of any of my friends. It has lost that right.

The writer is a senior banker at HSBC. These are his personal views

Post new comment

E-mail ID will not be published
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

FC NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on our latest news!

EDITORIAL OF THE DAY

  • Retail investors need to be drawn to bond trading

    A country requires both a healthy capital market and a liquid debt market for vibrant economic growth. India has had the first for a long time.

INTERVIEWS

GV Nageswara Rao

MD & CEO, IDBI Federal Life

Timothy Moe

Goldman Sachs

Chander Mohan Sethi

CMD, Reckitt Benckiser India

COLUMNIST

Urs Schöttli

Japan’s living national treasures

While the world is fascinated by the economic “miracles” in ...

Robert Clements

Cherish good times and accept bad ones

Initially, I was angry and confused, I was even repentant…,” ...

Bubbles Sabharwal

Mothers just see things differently; they can’t help it

Before we begin on mothers, I have to share this ...