RIL slams DGH move to snatch gas discoveries as arbitrary
Sep 15 2013 , New Delhi
Reliance Executive Director P M S Prasad on August 24 wrote a strongly worded letter to Oil Secretary Vivek Rae, questioning the intent of the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH) in asking the company to give up 6,601 sq km out of the total 7,645 sq km area in the block on the grounds that the time line to develop the fields had expired.
Of the eight discoveries in the area, the DGH refused to consider investment plans for five, with 0.8 trillion cubic feet of reserves, saying they were not viable at the current price of USD 4.2 per million British thermal units.
The regulator refused to recognise the other three as discoveries in the absence of prescribed tests to confirm them and then disallowed pleas by Reliance and partner BP Plc for time to do the tests.
"In spite of the PSC providing for sale of gas at market prices, and the approved price of USD 4.2 being only valid until March 31, 2014, DGH insisted on evaluating the proposed development plan (of five discoveries) at a gas price of USD 4.2 and declared them to be unviable," Prasad said, adding this was done even after the knowledge that the field would start production much later than April 2014.
Prasad said Reliance-BP had agreed to carry out the DGH- prescribed drill stem test to confirm the three discoveries but the regulator never approved them and was now insisting on relinquishment of the areas.
In the 11-page letter with point-by-point rebuttals to the DGH claims, a copy of which was marked to Oil Minister M Veerappa Moily, Prasad asked Rae to "advise the concerned to rectify the errors and remove the hurdles which are needlessly delaying further progression in these discoveries."
RIL had offered to relinquish 4,233 sq km of "low prospectivity area" in the eastern offshore KG-DWN-98/3 or KG-D6 block in keeping with the contractual requirement to retain only portions needed to produce oil and gas.
The area RIL is seeking to retain contains the 20 oil and gas finds it has made till date.
"Needlessly projecting RIL as a defaulter and forcing the contractor to relinquish discovered resources will not only hurt the investor but considerably reduce the chances of many of these discoveries ever being produced," Prasad said.
"Contractor (RIL) is of the view that the action is clearly an afterthought, based on arbitrary decision and tantamount to disputing completely valid discoveries made at the contractor's risk," he wrote.