Maruti to challenge CCI penalty,says order lacks understanding

Tags: News
Country's largest carmaker Maruti Suzuki India today said it would challenge the penalty imposed on it by CCI for violation of trade norms in the spare parts and after services market.

"I believe what CCI has done (is) that they have not understood the entire issue of spare parts of cars. What they are saying may apply to other industries (but not in auto)...There is a lack of understanding of the difference. (The auto) industry by its nature is totally different," Maruti Suzuki India (MSI) Chairman RC Bhargava told PTI in an interview.

Asked if the company would challenge the order, he said: "We will have to challenge the order. There is no question of not challenging the order."

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) had slapped a total penalty of Rs 2,545 crore on 14 car makers in India on Monday. Out of the total, the fine imposed on MSI was Rs 471.14 crore.

Stating that the functioning of the automobile industry, specially with regards to the spares are different from other industrial sectors, Bhargava said said CCI hasn't taken a holistic view.

"What the CCI has dealt with is that it will result in lowering the prices of the spare parts. They have totally forgotten that most parts of the car are critical for safety or for pollution or environment or for performance," Bhargava said.

He further said: "Now cost does not cover the quality of the parts you put into the car, they have totally not dealt with the quality part of the car."

Already Mahindra & Mahindra and Tata Motors have said they would challenge the CCI order at an appropriate forum.

As per the Competition Act 2002, orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) can be challenged before the COMPAT (Competition Appellate Tribunal) within 60 days.

The other companies fined by CCI are Volkswagen India, Fiat India Automobiles, BMW India, Ford India, General Motors India, Hindustan Motors, Mercedes-Benz India, Nissan Motor India, Skoda Auto India and Toyota Kirloskar Motor.

CCI found that auto firms violated competition norms with respect to its agreements with local Original Equipment Suppliers (OESs) as well as with authorised dealers.

Through these agreements, the car makers "imposed absolute restrictive covenants and completely foreclosed the after market for supply of spare parts and other diagnostic tools", CCI had said.

The regulator had also ordered the automobile companies to undertake certain compliances within 180 days from the receipt of the order and has directed them to submit a report within 60 days of receipt of the order on the action initiated for compliance with the order.

Post new comment

E-mail ID will not be published
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

EDITORIAL OF THE DAY

  • State-owned banks can ride technology surge to penetrate retail segment

    For the first time in recent history, two large private sectors banks, ICICI and Axis have reduced their headcounts.

FC NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on our latest news!

INTERVIEWS

Sarthak Raychaudhuri

vice-president, HR, Asia South Whirlpool of India

GV Nageswara Rao

MD & CEO, IDBI Federal Life

Timothy Moe

Goldman Sachs

TODAY'S COLUMNS

Amita Sharma

The rabbit hole of outcome budgets

Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to ...

Zehra Naqvi

Dignity of labour is dignity of life

M Rafi Khan, a retired police IG, used to ...

Gautam Gupta

Retailers have it tough, thanks to e-commerce

For the past few months our focus has been on ...

INTERVIEWS

William D. Green

Chairman & CEO, Accenture