Diversion of funds, ineligible beneficiaries in JNNURM: CAG

Tags: CAG, JNNURM, News
Diversion of funds totalling nearly Rs 115 crore and ineligible beneficiaries getting benefits were

RELATED ARTICLES

among the several lapses found by CAG in implementation of JNNURM, the Centre's flagship urban infrastructure development scheme.

Government auditor Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) also said that a few cases of unauthorised and irregular expenditure and even instances of undue favours to contractors have come to light.

The CAG in its report on "Performance Audit of Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission(JNNURM)" tabled in Parliament today said only 22 of the 1,517 housing projects approved under the scheme were completed by the due date of March 2011.

Noting that the Union ministries were "not equipped" to monitor a project of this magnitude, the CAG said the Centre must identify the deficiences in monitoring the sceheme both at the central and state level and address them during the next two years.

The 103-page report with annexures observed that a crucial objective of bringing about reforms in the governance of Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) could not be achieved through the scheme.

"We observed that a total of 1,517 and 1,998 housing and infrastructure projects respectively were approved for implementation between 2005 and 2011. However, as on 31 March 2011, in respect of the housing projects, only 22 of the 1517 approved projects were completed," the CAG report said.

"The status of dwelling units within these housing projects was only marginally better but remained low as only 26 per cent of approved dwelling units had been completed. In respect of urban infrastructure projects, we observed that out of the 1,298 projects approved, only 231 projects (18 per cent) were completed," the report stated.

The report pointed out that there were eight cases of diversion of funds in Urban Infrastructure projects in Andhra Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Haryana, Jharkand, West Bengal and Himachal Pradesh. The amount diverted was Rs 114.68 crore,it said.

The diversion was for purposes other than those admissible under JNNURM and in some cases even for non-JNNURM purposes. In one instance, funds were utilised for payment of salary to the municipal staff.

Post new comment

E-mail ID will not be published
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

EDITORIAL OF THE DAY

  • State-owned banks can ride technology surge to penetrate retail segment

    For the first time in recent history, two large private sectors banks, ICICI and Axis have reduced their headcounts.

FC NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on our latest news!

INTERVIEWS

Sarthak Raychaudhuri

vice-president, HR, Asia South Whirlpool of India

GV Nageswara Rao

MD & CEO, IDBI Federal Life

Timothy Moe

Goldman Sachs

TODAY'S COLUMNS

Amita Sharma

The rabbit hole of outcome budgets

Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to ...

Zehra Naqvi

Dignity of labour is dignity of life

M Rafi Khan, a retired police IG, used to ...

Gautam Gupta

Retailers have it tough, thanks to e-commerce

For the past few months our focus has been on ...

INTERVIEWS

William D. Green

Chairman & CEO, Accenture