Budget had nothing new for the auto industry

Budget 2014 was certainly not revolutionary, and did not offer any benefits to the auto industry.

However, it does set a directional approach, and is indicative of a medium to long term road map to achieve a 7 per cent to 8 per cent growth. It is also in sync with the election manifesto and outlines a policy framework for future.

The reduction of the fiscal deficit from 4.1 per cent in 2015 to 3.6 per cent in 2016 and 3 per cent in 2017 is a tall task. It is not clear how this would be realised. Overall, it appears to be an investor friendly, growth oriented budget.

Setting up an expenditure management commission is a step in the right direction.

The focus on reviving the manufacturing sector and job creation is once again a positive approach. Increasing the FDI cap in select sectors, particularly in insurance and defence to 49 per cent was as anticipated. The major negative is the non-repealing of the retrospective tax. Review of the transfer pricing regulations was overdue. Tinkering with benefits through individuals through direct taxation will generate a positive sentiment amongst the salaried class.

Generally speaking, the focus on inflation, housing and infrastructure, education, rural road development and the agriculture sector should provide the desired impetus to growth.

Therefore, whilst the intentions and direction are clear, it yet has to be seen how the FM can earn enough to pay for growth-oriented initiatives.

Disinvestment is a source of revenue generation to meet the deficit.

The modus operandi was not spelt out.

However, diluting stakes in PSU Banks and yet controlling interest was an indicator of the disinvestment plans during the current financial year.

Rolling back of subsidies was also not explicitly clarified.

Post new comment

E-mail ID will not be published
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

EDITORIAL OF THE DAY

  • Amidst Sino-Indian bonhomie, the Tibet issue cannot be wished away

    Tibet did not figure in the three-day high-level meetings between India and the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

FC NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on our latest news!

INTERVIEWS

GV Nageswara Rao

MD & CEO, IDBI Federal Life

Timothy Moe

Goldman Sachs

Chander Mohan Sethi

CMD, Reckitt Benckiser India

COLUMNIST

Varun Dutt

<b>Riskfactor</b>: Intertemporal choices

Intertemporal choice is the study of the relative value people ...

Parvez Imam

Why we all have blood on our hands

What does the Jammu and Kashmir flood make us think? ...

Dharmendra Khandal

The peculiar possibilities of animal poop

You can tell a lot about an animal by its ...

INTERVIEWS

William D. Green

Chairman & CEO, Accenture