Apple, Samsung trade barbs as new patent trial opens

Tags: apple, Samsung, News
Lawyers for Apple and Samsung exchanged barbs as a major new patent trial opened

RELATED ARTICLES

and debated the role of a company not even part of the case -- Google.

Apple's legal team vowed to prove that Samsung flagrantly copied iPhone features and should pay more than $2 billion in damages, as the two smartphone giants squared off anew in a California courtroom.

Apple attorney Harold McElhinny opened his presentation with a video showing legendary Apple co-founder Steve Jobs introducing the first iPhone in 2007.

By putting computing power in smartphones powered by fun software and easy to use touch-screens, Apple transformed the market, sending Samsung onto its heels, according to McElhinny.

The attorney told jurors in his opening statement that they would see internal Samsung documents and messages showing that the company felt it was suffering "a crisis of design" with the difference between its devices and the smartphone "a difference between Heaven and Earth."

Apple said evidence will show that the South Korean electronics giant sold more than 37 million infringing smartphones and tablets in the United States.

California-based Apple would have demanded royalties of from $33 to $40 per device to license the patented technology to Samsung, according to McElhinny.

The overall amount being sought by Apple in damages from Samsung will top $2 billion, the lawyer explained.

"This case is not about Google," McElhinny told jurors.

"It is Samsung, not Google, that choses to put these features into its phones."

But Samsung's lawyer told the jurors in the San Jose, California, court, that the case was indeed about Google, and Apple's struggle against the maker of the Android operating system which is now winning in the global marketplace.

Post new comment

E-mail ID will not be published
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

EDITORIAL OF THE DAY

  • Redefining the age of minors from 18 to 16 makes sense

    An issue that’s been simmering since the horrific gangrape of December 2013 is finally being laid to rest.

FC NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on our latest news!

INTERVIEWS

Sarthak Raychaudhuri

vice-president, HR, Asia South Whirlpool of India

GV Nageswara Rao

MD & CEO, IDBI Federal Life

Timothy Moe

Goldman Sachs

TODAY'S COLUMNS

Urs Schoettli

The difficulties with war history

There have been a series of commemorative events lately. Last ...

Anish Chakraborty

Betting big on Pascal’s wager

Blaise Pascal was a 17th century French philosopher mathematician and ...

Bubbles Sabharwal

The five cardinal rules of urban snobs

Believe it or not there is the unspoken-of society of ...

INTERVIEWS

William D. Green

Chairman & CEO, Accenture