To conserve or not: Mumbaikars must decide

Tags: Knowledge
Bang in the middle of India’s most populated city, Mumbai, is Sanjay Gandhi National Park (SGNP), the area of which is 104 sq km. It has two huge lakes, which partly takes care of Mumbai’s drinking water requirements. Unfortunately, there is no data available on how much carbon dioxide it sinks and how much fresh air it releases over this polluted city. But, as you can imagine, the national park offers a slice of nature inside this ultra dense city.

There is an interesting experiment happening these days in the SGNP where Mumbaikars, scientists, researchers and park managers are trying to look for ways to coexist in harmony with the wildlife around them. Sunil Limaye, chief conservator and director of SGNP, started this initiative. He got the researchers to carry out scientific data collection. According to him though mere scientific data collection is not enough but a synergy among stakeholders must also be developed. This, he hopes, would motivate everyone involved to save the forest and wildlife.

Some times in this silent city forest, top predator leopard attracts negative publicity because of its tendency to attack humans. But thankfully, since 2007, there has been no human deaths caused by leopards around the main park. It is possible that some unethical practices were being followed to bring down such incidents, perhaps making leopards suffer in the bargain. These kinds of incidents do not occur often if animals are left to themselves. But we know so little about why the otherwise shy creature should lose its fear of people and attack them. Basic data on SNGP leopard’s biology is not available. We are not aware of these leopards’ predatory behaviour, how much area they range over and how frequently and how far they walk out of the park. We do not know if there is enough natural prey available for these leopards and which other predators — such as hyena — coexist with them. Without proper information, it is difficult to understand conflict as well as ways to effectively manage it.

Mumbaikars for SGNP forum is headed by Vidya Athreya, a well-known biologist, who use methodologies such as camera traps to obtain evidence of leopard presence, prey occupancy studies for determining prey population and scat analysis so the dietary behaviour can be studied. Vidya believes that if science is shared with citizens, some progress can be made but it is for Mumbaikars to decide whether all the good that comes with the leopards and the forest —clean air, water and greenery — is needed by them or not. Ultimately, if it is a yes, then saving of this is also in the hands of Mumbaikars. But Mumbaikars have shown that they are determined to achieve this task and are slowly growing and gathering momentum to save the forest and its species.

Limaye, on his part is also motivating the local staff through training sessions, workshops and refresher courses. This type of joint action will be the only method by which this busy city forest can be saved, because finally its fate lies in the hands of its citizens.

(The writer is a conservation biologist at

Tiger Watch, Ranthambore)

A very well written piece!

A very well written piece! Mr.Limaye has indeed been a very dynamic director as of till now and has introduced a few much needed changes to how the SGNP functions. Also, I hope the editor of this publication hasn't made ANY change to the original work sent by Dharm ji, as doing that, even subtle ones (at least in conservation and natural history), can mean an entirely different thing altogether!
Cheers.

"Some times in this silent

"Some times in this silent city forest, top predator leopard attracts negative publicity because of its tendency to attack humans. "

This statement (of its tendency to attack humans) is absolutely incorrect and moreso when its not the exact words of the columnist, why have you taken up the authority of describing the animal's behaviour incorrectly??

The leopard issue, as the

The leopard issue, as the author is trying to highlight in this article is more complex that we are aware of and a large part of the fear among the public is because of the way media represents the leopard. Like it is been reported here wrongly due to editing changes by the publication - that leopards have a tendency to attack humans. It is like saying that the muslims have a tendency to be terrorists - it is such a bad and negative representation that has much more far reaching consequences that the editor sitting at his desk can fathom. All of us who work in the conservation of large cats request that you please be careful before you make such sweeping statements because you are only reinforcing the fear in people's minds which in turn leads to the call for the leopards removal from it has been seen (even when it has not done anything) leading to human attacks. thanks vidya

I doubt whether the article

I doubt whether the article is written by the said author.
It seems is written by some one else.

Post new comment

E-mail ID will not be published
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

FC NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on our latest news!

EDITORIAL OF THE DAY

  • Foreign brokerages must be Street-smart to win battle of bourses

    Earlier this week, Financial Chronicle reported that foreign brokerages were failing to crack the retail broking market in India, once seen as very pr

INTERVIEWS

GV Nageswara Rao

MD & CEO, IDBI Federal Life

Timothy Moe

Goldman Sachs

Chander Mohan Sethi

CMD, Reckitt Benckiser India

COLUMNIST

Urs Schöttli

India needs to project soft power

The rise from a regional to a global p­ower is ...

Robert Clements

Walk the talk when giving others advice

The only thing one does with advice is to pass ...

Bubbles Sabharwal

Keeping our value system uninjured

Every time one reads a newspaper, there is fr­esh news ...