RELATED ARTICLES |
Law permits 51 per cent FDI in single brand retail and 100 per cent-FDI in the wholesale cash and carry trade. FDI is, however, completely banned in multi-brand organised retail. The retail market is $300-350 billion is dominated by the unorganised sector.
The feedback, published on the DIPP website, seems to be mixed voting both for and against allowing FDI in the sector.
Rajan Bharti Mittal, VC and MD of Bharti Enterprises, is of the view that the government has made foreign investment regime attractive for India to receive significant inflows of FDI. “Domestic players cannot make significant investments in to retail alone,” he says. FDI in multi-brand retailing will help ensure adequate flow of capital and its productive use to promote the cause of modern retail and employment generation, Mittal adds.
“FDI in multi-brand retail should be encouraged in small cities and rural areas, as bulk of the consumers live in small towns,” according to chairman DCM Shriram Consolidated, DSCL, Ajay S Shriram said.
MNCs could resort to ‘buying cheap, selling dear’. If the domestic retail market is affected, many people will lose jobs, says M Venkataraman, treasurer, Thevaram Varthakarkal Sangam.
“We strongly oppose to the FDI in multi- brand retail for numerous reasons. It will increase MNC market share. Once established they will dictate market with cartels between big players resulting in abnormal rates,” according to MP federation of chamber of commerce and industry.
“FDI multi-brand retails are like huge sharks. SME retailers are afraid that the incoming FDI big sharks will eat up their share of business” Kailash Agarwal, president, Bhopal Chambers of Commerce said.
“Modern retail can offer an good platform to service providers for banks to use retail infrastructure as a point of consumer contact,” Professor A Amarendra Reddy ASCI institute, Hyderabad said.


















Post new comment