Crunch time for those who laid off ruthlessly
Feb 15 2010
In the real world, the process of retrenchment varied. Compassionate managements innovated ways to take care of employees. For instance, some offered employees the option of moving to low-cost centres; others offered relocation assistance or organised job fairs for laid-off employees; one company retained employees on the payroll without a salary; a few shifted regular employees to contractual employment, and some gave two or three months’ exit notice. Experiences at the other extreme were also noted. Some companies suddenly sealed laptops, seized files and handed incumbents a pink slip without any notice whatsoever. Worse were the instances where employee vouchers were scrutinised for discrepancies, such as incorrect TA or DA bills, traditionally ignored, and employees then threatened with termination on this account, if they did not themselves resign.
For employers who downsized ruthlessly in 2009, the chickens may come home to roost in 2010. With the Indian – and global — economy rebounding earlier and faster than expected, companies are once again scouting for talent. The yardstick for employees evaluating companies has undergone a sea change, though. Where higher salaries once lured candidates in droves, job security and stability are the new watchwords. This is borne out by news reports in the past year that government and PSU jobs were sought out by a broad array of applicants, including management students. What’s more, headhunters and executive search firms are approaching well-heeled and well-qualified prospects with PSU openings — unthinkable two years ago.
Another key takeaway from the global slowdown: during troubled times, smart crisis management opens new windows of opportunities and separates minnows from masters. This is the time to invent new win-win models of existence that spotlight the company’s caring face by considering the employee’s welfare, whilst also keeping a sharp eye on the company’s bottom line. This is only possible when companies genuinely care and walk the talk by adopting transparent processes. When the going gets tough, people tend to believe that news about rough times erodes brand equity. Ask a brand management guru or a crisis management expert and they will reveal secrets that ethical long-term players have learnt over time. As the excellence theory goes – an organisation that maintains its reputation of nurturing an overall ‘open and honest’ policy with stakeholders and the news media suffers less financial, collateral and perceptual damage than an organisation that does not.
Companies that retrenched staff in 2009 may face more challenges in hiring in 2010. Would the ex-employees rejoin a previous employer who sacked them at the first sign of trouble? How companies harness relationships during tough times reflects on how employees respond to their call in the future.
That’s not all — even the new talent pool the company seeks to hire will most likely know how the previous employees were treated. Consequently, some may not join; others may sign the appointment letter but not come on board due to second thoughts; a few may sign the appointment letter but join another company where job security is assured. That’s not the end of the negative outcomes — those who do join could have failed to secure other jobs and may therefore not be the most talented, while those without an option would come on board as ‘passengers’ and get off at the next station the moment a worthwhile opportunity appears. In a nutshell, sacking employees during downturns has long-term consequences few companies may foresee.
Besides loss of tremendous societal goodwill, there may be collateral damage, too. With new media such as email, the internet, blogs, moblogs, social media and professional networks disgruntled employees can simply go online to wash the company’s dirty linen and attract a global audience. Assaults on companies in the virtual world can cause immense damage in the real world. Indeed, that’s a lesson some Fortune 500 companies have learnt the hard way.
But companies that did everything to cut costs except thoughtlessly lay off employees may smile broadly in 2010. Such firms will save time, money and effort now by not having to hire or rehire people. Best of all, employee morale will be high, with loyalty touching peak levels despite tempting offers. These caring firms will be better placed to ride the high tide of prosperity that’s inevitable after every cyclical low tide.
The writers are associate professors at Gurgaon-based Management Development Institute


















Post new comment